The Bombay High Court has observed that marriage is a partnership of equals and cannot be treated like a service contract, while ruling that a wife cannot be expected to perform household chores as a legal duty amounting to marital obligation.
A bench of Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande held that a wife’s inability or refusal to cook or clean cannot, by itself, be considered “mental cruelty” under the law.
“Marriage is a partnership of equals. It is not a service contract or an employment agreement, and a wife is not a maid,” the court observed, while dismissing the husband’s claim for divorce on grounds of cruelty.
The court clarified that routine disagreements and adjustments between spouses in the early phase of marriage cannot be treated as cruelty unless there is evidence of serious and sustained harassment or conduct that makes cohabitation impossible.
It further noted that allegations made by the husband regarding non-performance of domestic chores and behavioural issues were of a “common and ordinary” nature, which do not meet the legal threshold for cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.
In the same ruling, the High Court also restored maintenance rights to the wife, holding that she could not be denied financial support based on unverified claims of independent income from small-scale activity.
The court directed that the wife be provided a monthly maintenance of ₹10,000 along with an additional ₹10,000 for accommodation, noting that the husband, a qualified Chartered Accountant, had sufficient means to support her.
The couple had married in 2002, with disputes arising within months. The husband had moved for divorce in 2004 alleging cruelty, while the wife alleged harassment and mistreatment in the matrimonial home.
The High Court ultimately set aside the earlier Family Court ruling, reaffirming that marital disputes must be assessed on the basis of legal standards of cruelty and not on stereotypical expectations of domestic roles.
